April 24th Update: We would like to share with you an exciting update about our ongoing Freedom of Information project to determine exactly how ‘Catholic’ publicly funded Catholic schools are in Alberta?
As you may be aware, the large numbers of non-Catholic students in Ontario is a major election issue that was recently exposed by the Globe and Mail and Toronto Star. These major newspapers even mentioned our campaign (have you recently donated?) Considering that the Globe and Mail editorial expressed outrage at Catholic schools in Ontario being funded by 8% non-Catholic students, just wait until they hear about the level of Catholic faith subsidies happening across Alberta! One of our volunteers has made Freedom of Information requests to all 17 Catholic school districts in Alberta to ascertain the numbers of truly Catholic students—both by district and by individual school. The same issue is happening in Ontario, and make no mistake: it is all about the money.
Take one Alberta case study: Edmonton Catholic. They publicly stated last year that they are financially propped up by enrolling 25 per cent non-Catholic students—that's over 10,000 non-Catholic students and hundreds of teaching jobs where qualified non-Catholic teachers are denied jobs for permitted religious discrimination. Why is Edmonton Catholic receiving $100 million per year in public funding for a purpose inconsistent with their mission … at the expense of local public schools? With 25 per cent of students at Edmonton Catholic schools NOT Catholic, the Alberta government has clearly overbuilt Catholic schools at the expense of all Edmontonians having the right to a local public school.
Despite this hypocrisy of purpose, Catholic schools which are actually not Catholic still deny job opportunities to non-Catholic staff and still fund programs that ‘permeate’ Catholic Church indoctrination! If Saskatchewan’s landmark Theodore Case applied to Alberta, the sustainability of many ‘low-Catholic’ schools in Alberta would be questionable as they would not be allowed to accept non-Catholic students for funding purposes.
Edmonton Catholic would need to immediately transfer many of their schools to Edmonton Public if the ‘Theodore’ decision was implemented in Alberta. When you think about the deferred maintenance bills and increased operating costs and duplication of half-empty Catholic schools that are half-full of non-Catholic students across a school ground from aging public schools -- isn't it time for government intervention? And Edmonton Catholic is still promoting expansion of their low-Catholic school system at a time when both districts are fighting for new or replacement schools — and Alberta is $10 billion in debt!
We are completely dependent on your generous donations to help us complete this Freedom of Information project across Alberta as a number of Catholic boards are fighting our requests for their religious statistics.
As an example, one Catholic school district wants $2,400 before handing over their statistics! But we’re going to persevere so local public school families across Alberta have the factual information to advocate that new or replacement schools built in each community should be a public schools, and continue to support our call for a referendum on Catholic school districts in Alberta. Our volunteers are also open to presenting local data to communities and public school boards across Alberta. Please remember to share this data with your friends on your social media!
Though this project is still ongoing, the results received thus far are very revealing. Will you help us sort and crunch the data? Email firstname.lastname@example.org if you can help us with charts, presentations, and analysis.
CALGARY MEET UP: For those of you In Calgary, we invite you to hear more from Stephen Carter, David King and Luke Fevin at the Education Panel as part of the Secular Alberta Conference. The panel will be a barn burner; get your tickets now!
CBC created a short explainer video (although we challenge their growth statistics in the conclusion) about why other provinces have chosen to abolish their separate school system. It just goes to show that more Canadians are working hard to end the privilege afforded to one separate school system and it lays it out how change in other provinces is possible-- and desirable!
Congratulations to the Alberta Liberal Party for putting forth a resolution to abolish separate Catholic School Boards in Alberta:
WHEREAS the current system of two, publicly funded school systems, one "public" and one "Catholic," is a dated relic from the 1890s and does not reflect the modern cultural, ethnic, linguistic and religious diversity that is Alberta today;
and WHEREAS it is discriminatory to fund one religious system 100 per cent to the exclusion of all of the other religious denominations in Alberta today;
and WHEREAS there are Alberta teachers who are being actively discriminated against by the Catholic School System on the basis of religion, a moral outrage in 2018;
and WHEREAS it is wasteful and inefficient to maintain two separate school systems, with duplication of resources, administration and capital expenditures; waste which is depriving the public system of much-needed funds to reduce class sizes and invest in our children,
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that an Alberta Liberal government will move to combine the separate school districts into a unified, public school system;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an Alberta Liberal government will commit to re-investing all of the savings from such unification back into our public school system;
and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an Alberta Liberal government will consult with stakeholders in the current separate system and design a model of delivery whereby Catholic education may be offered as an alternative program in the public stream.
Why can't non-Catholics teach in publicly funded separate Catholic schools? Why is this employment discrimination still permitted? Read this teacher's heartbreaking story:
"In no other avenue of work are employers allowed to discriminate on the basis of religion like this... (read more)
Sign up and help us end the discriminatory hiring practices: www.ouridea.ca/jobs
Presentation to the Debate/Conversation Organized by the Centre for Constitutional Studies (the University of Alberta)
Thursday, February 8th, 2018
Room 150, the Telus Centre for Learning
"The provincial government, essentially acting alone, can disestablish separate school education: it has the capacity. Procedurally the way is quite straight forward. In the last 21 years, two provinces – Quebec, and Newfoundland and Labrador have amended their respective provincial constitutions to disestablish denominational school systems.
It is probably correct to say that a constitution should not change often. On the other hand, if a community is to remain strong and vital in real time, sometimes constitutions need to change. There was a day when Alberta did not own the natural resources beneath its soil. There was a day when women did not have the right to vote. We can sometimes be thankful for change.
It has been suggested that it would be ‘wrong’ for the majority to terminate a constitutional right of a minority. My response is that we need to be very careful about ‘rights’: they are not all of one kind and sophism has been used to cause confusion and uncertainty by conflating the different meanings of ‘right’. Not all constitutional rights are human rights: many are the delivery of a political compromise, and the Constitution of Canada is full of such. Such ‘rights’ have a limited shelf-life. They only persist for as long as there is a strong sense that they are vital to the very being of the federation. Our federation will not founder when our two systems are unified.
More significantly, sometimes the majority must protect the rights of a minority of one. Sometimes the majority must end the privilege of a significant minority. There was a day when only land-owners could vote: they were privileged. There was a day when South Africa experienced ‘separate but equal’ development: whites were privileged.
In the context of justice, privilege is an injustice.
We need the courage to look past what is politically correct in order to discern what is right. We need the courage to hear rhetoric and emotion without absorbing it or succumbing to it. We need to think deeply, speak carefully, and act faithfully in search of a better democracy with less privilege, more equity, and more justice for all."
(FULL REMARKS BELOW)Read more
(Feb. 20, 2018) Equal funding for religious education will save Albertans $530 million a year
—Catholic Church asked to subsidize Catholic students for Budget 2019
Edmonton — ourIDEA (Inclusive, Diverse Education for All), a fast-growing citizen coalition calling for the amalgamation of Catholic and public schools, today asks the Alberta government to fund the operational costs of Catholic schools at the same level as all other religious schools in the province.
Currently, private non-Catholic religious schools in Alberta receive only 70 percent of provincial per pupil funding that a Catholic school receives. If Catholic schools received the same level of subsidy as all other religious schools in Alberta, Albertans would save $530 million dollars annually to redirect towards the provincial deficit or hire 5,300 more teachers for the public school system.
To use another comparator, if Alberta funded its Catholic schools at 50 percent of per pupil funding — the same level as in British Columbia — Alberta taxpayers would save a staggering $880 Million dollars annually to redirect towards the provincial deficit or to hire an army of 8,880 more teachers for the public school system.
Savings of this magnitude are entirely achievable if all religions were simply treated equally by our provincial government. But since the Catholic Church benefits enormously by the current preferential system, it is only reasonable to ask them to infill provincial subsidy shortfalls for Catholic families.
“There is no logical or moral justification for Alberta taxpayers to subsidize one religious school system above all others to waste $550 million a year,” says Kenn Bur, a volunteer with ourIDEA . “In this time of compassionate belt tightening, with class sizes growing, special needs students struggling and a provincial budget deficit in excess of $10 billion, we all have to contribute extra. It’s time for the Catholic Church to begin contributing financially to its own religious education system.
“Religious entitlement costs Alberta taxpayers $550 million/year — in addition to enormous unnecessary capital costs to maintain duplicate infrastructure,” says Bur. “By simply treating all religious schools equally, we could pay down our provincial deficit and avoid the likelihood of a provincial sales tax in the future.”
The data that Our IDEA analysts used for these comparisons is from publicly available audited financial statements provided by Catholic school boards in 2017. These financial reports reveal that Albertans spent $1.77 billion last year to operate a duplicate educational system consisting of 17 separate Catholic school boards.
TAX SAVINGS FROM OPERATING FUNDING ADJUSTMENTS TO SEPARATE CATHOLIC SCHOOL BOARDS
Catholic Church Contribution
Same funding as Alberta public schools
Same funding as all other religious schools in Alberta
$530 million / year
$3,270/year per student (or $272.50/month)
Same funding level as BC’s Catholic schools
$880 million / year
$5,450/year per student (or $454.17/month)
* Our IDEA welcomes any factual corrections. We also ask the Province of Alberta for a comprehensive and transparent audit of all annual subsidies to Catholic schools in Alberta.
1. ACTION: Millions of taxpayer dollars at stake as Catholic trustees scuttle shared bus services.
2. ACTION: Does your public school trustee stand up for Public schools?
3. ACTION: Complete the Budget 2018 survey and say "NO" to outrageous superintendent salaries
4. INFORMATION: A Catholic trustee shows value in merging school boards
5. INFORMATION: Did you know Catholic schools are operating inside of Public schools?
6. EVENT: Debate: Do we need a Catholic school system? (5:30PM, Thursday, February 8th)
If you ever needed a good reason to spread the word about our petition, you have to read this story. Alberta Catholic school trustees voted to send money-- taxpayer education dollars-- outside of Alberta to fight a court case for the right of a private business to discriminate against LGBTQ:
“They’re going to use public dollars to fight the public with public dollars – essentially on human rights issues. Which is, of course, completely mad,” Fevin said. Fevin objects to ACSTA spending the money on a case involving a private business that has “absolutely nothing to do” with K-12 education in Alberta.
We also need your help. Please Chip in $100 or whatever you can afford to help our next campaign: ending religious discrimination against Alberta teachers....Read more
In Alberta there is no constitutional grounds for “permeation”, as it is currently being practiced by many separate school jurisdictions. Particularly since the adoption of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982, there is nothing that gives ‘permeation’ any status superior to the Charter. Separate schools are as subject to the Charter as are public schools.....
(If you would like to hear David on the Polticoast Podcast please skip 18 min in to hear his interview:
Separate school education inflicts a financial cost we can no longer afford and an social injustice we should no longer tolerate. Here are my six objections:Read more
One of the questions we have heard the most is, "Can it be done?" The answer is yes, and we point to Newfoundland, Quebec and Manitoba as examples of jurisdictions where citizens chose to put education first. Take a moment to listen to this CBC special on the unification of school boards in Newfoundland:
As Newfoundland Premier Brian Tobin said as they concluded their separate Catholic school system:
"We couldn't afford it," he said. "We weren't putting our money into providing the best education system for our children. We were putting our money into maintaining buildings — some of which were half empty — and busing people an hour away rather than letting them go to the school in their community because it wasn't a denominational fit."
1997: Twenty Years ago Newfoundland voted to get rid of their separate Catholic schools.
-The question posed in the 1997 referendum was this: "Do you support a single school system where all children, regardless of their religious affiliation, attend the same schools where opportunities for religious education and observances are provided?"
-A whopping 73 per cent of voters said yes.
-Since the province's church-run school system was part of the Constitution, Newfoundland and Labrador needed a constitutional amendment in order for the change to go through. Canada's Senate passed the amendment in December of 1997.
-That same month, the Senate passed a very similar constitutional amendment for Quebec. It allowed Quebec to restructure its school system from a religion-based system to one organized along linguistic lines.
-Today, only three provinces maintain a system of publicly funded separate schools (primarily Catholic) alongside their public secular systems - Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan.
As people consider the petition asking for a provincial referendum, we are getting questions about separate school education and the Constitution.
In Alberta, separate school education is a constitutional entitlement ( privilege). It is called an entitlement to distinguish it from a “human right” since it is not something that all Albertans share on an equal basis. It is not a 'right' within the meaning of the Charter of Rights.
In fact, separate school education probably violates the Charter of Rights, which is why Section 29 of the Charter protects separate school education from a legal challenge. But section 29 does not protect separate school education from a constitutional amendment.
Constitutional entitlements are not chiseled in stone. Constitutions change over time either by amendment or by new enactments, or by judicial decisions. At one time Alberta did not own the natural resources under the ground. That was changed by the Natural Resources Transfer Agreement Act, 1930. At one time women were not recognized as persons when considering appointments to the Senate. That was changed by a decision of what was then the supreme court of Canada.
The approved way of dealing with the issue is simple and straight forward, and it doesn’t take a lot of time. It’s been done twice in the past 20 years. In 1997 both the province of Newfoundland and Labrador and the province of Quebec did away with denominational education. In Newfoundland and Labrador the government acted on the outcome of a provincial referendum that strongly supported the creation of a single public school system and the end of seven denominational school systems. In Quebec the National Assembly (Legislative Assembly of that province) acted without a referendum. A referendum is optional for the government.
The bare bones of the procedure is simple. The government drafts a resolution with an attached amendment to part of the provincial constitution (in our case, the Alberta Act, 1905). The attachment contains the exact wording of the desired amendment. If the resolution is adopted by the legislative assembly it is sent, with the attached wording of the desired amendment, to the Government of Canada. The Government of Canada adopts the desired wording as it is put forward by the provincial government.
In 1997 Prime Minister Chretien imposed a “3-line whip” on the government caucus in both the House of Commons and the Senate. His position was that education is the responsibility of the provincial government and a federal government is conscience bound to do what the provincial government wants done, unless what the province wants done is clearly contrary to the Charter of Rights or the basics of democracy.
Since the Government of Canada has enacted amendments for both Newfoundland and Labrador and Quebec dealing with the end of denominational education, it is probably safe to assume that the Government of Canada would enact a similar amendment if Alberta asked for it.
The challenge is not the constitution. The challenge is to determine what is best for Alberta at the beginning of the 21st century and, if that is unification of the two systems, the next challenge is to encourage the government to find the political will to do what the public wants done. (As a famous French politician once said, “The people, the people, where are the people? I must find them, for I am their leader.”)
This morning, Premier Notley told reporters that the NDP has no plans to scrap Catholic education system despite the (now international) sex-ed controversy.....Read more